Michigan lawmakers are considering a pass/fail reading retention policy for 3rd grade students through House Bill HB 5111 Sponsored by Rep. Amanda Price.
Sec. 1280f. (1) Beginning in the 2014-2015 school year, if a pupil enrolled in grade 3 in a school district or public school academy does not achieve a score of at least proficient in reading on the grade 3 state assessment, the board of the school district or board of directors of the public school academy in which the pupil is enrolled shall ensure that the pupil is not enrolled in grade 4 until the pupil achieves a score of at least proficient in reading on the grade 3 state assessment.
2) If a child seeks to enroll for the first time in a school district or public school academy in grade 4, the school district or public school academy shall not allow the pupil to enroll in grade 4 unless the pupil has achieved a score of at least proficient in reading on the grade 3 state assessment.
This legislation, however noble the intent leaves many troubling questions and concerns unanswered.
Does this law include special needs students or those with disabilities?
What happens if the child does not pass a second time?
How many times should a student be allowed to fail?
Will a 10 or 11 year old continue in third grade with 8 year olds until they are “proficient” according to some arbitrary test? Is the reason they failed because they struggle with actually knowing how to read or how to take a standardized test?
What if they are above grade level in math, won’t this cause them to repeat a subject in which they excel?
Will this lead to even earlier testing practice tests to make sure they are ready for this test?
How does the judgment of teacher factor into the decision to fail a student?
The primary motivation for Price’s bill is to motivate parents take to take responsibility for their child’s education, school accountability is a secondary concern. Parents, lawmakers believe you are the reason your child is not reading. But as a case in Highland Park demonstrates, parents were angry because they knew their children were not reading well-enough, yet the school refused to act.
Action 2: Expand access to high-quality child care, pre-kindergarten (pre-K), and full-day kindergarten interventions as early as possible.5.4 Develop coordinated ECE and K-12 data systems to support quality improvement